Understanding Power: Africa's Only Hope

Understanding Power: Africa's Only Hope

Understanding power: Africa’s only hope

Reason Wafawarova

22 July 2010

THE ability of the dominant imperial West to socially manufacture or markedly influence the state of consciousness and conduct in Africans and other non-white communities — to perpetuate white supremacy, is both the source and product of the power relations and inequalities which inhere between races.

The only time white social manufacturing of black consciousness and behaviour will ever come to an end is when the power differentials which make this process possible are equalised or reversed, and that only by black empowerment.

However, the African cannot come to this point unless and until that day is realised when Africa will come to understand the nature of power, and only then will this necessary equation or reversal of power relations begin.

There is a compelling need to understand the social origins and applications of power, and Africans must come to realise that they are as capable of acquiring power and disposing it as are their counterparts from any other race.

We must come to a point as Africans when we can consciously and deliberately choose to acquire and dispose power in our own interests, and in the defence of our own liberty. We need a very pragmatic understanding and application of power as was outlined once by Foucault.

He wrote: "Power is conceived not as a property, but as a strategy, that its effects of domination are attributed not to ‘appropriation’, but to dispositions, manoeuvres, tactics, techniques, functions; that one should decipher in it a network of relations, constantly in tension, in activity, rather than a privilege that one might possess; that one should take as its model a perpetual battle rather than a contract regulating a transaction or the conquest of a territory."

In short, Foucault says power is exercised rather than possessed; it is not the privilege, acquired or preserved; of the dominant elite. Power is the overall effect of its total strategic positions.

There is need for Africans to begin neutralising the traditional strategies and tactics used by dominant imperial Western elites to order, re-order and disorder African consciousness and behaviour. We have to unapologetically and resolutely embark on African-centred strategic and tactical counterattacks.

There is a metaphysical preparation needed for Africa before we can undertake such countermoves.

Firstly, we need a thorough decolonising of African consciousness and behaviour, and secondly we have to come up with a comprehensive method of organising the African community. We must come to a point when we can count on African capability in creating a collective intelligence and adaptational talent, which in turn will make it possible for Africa to overthrow white supremacy.

We may want to look at specific actions that may need to be embarked on if Africa is to win the power games that disadvantage our people today.

The Reintegration of African History

Many writers have pointed to the need for Africans to rediscover, re-examine and reintegrate the culture and history of our continent. The approaches to African history must in and of themselves conjointly become the vehicles, which facilitate the collective and co-operative action of African peoples in the pursuit of their total liberation.

It is only an appropriate reclamation of African history and culture that will provide Africans with a realistic and supportive vision of reality; with self-knowledge, self-esteem, self-confidence, self-acceptance and self-control.

We need a leadership in Africa that seeks to form empowering affectionate relationships between our people and other races — a leadership that hunts after ability for Africa to engage in proactive, self-interested productive activity. We need a self-enhancing sense of purpose and existential meaningfulness. We have to terminate this assimilationist African leadership that believes that the role of Africa in world economics is to provide natural resources and cheap labour.

The scepticism by Westerners and their black lapdogs over the capacity of black-owned companies to successfully mine Zimbabwe’s diamonds is simply a sad reflection of the African portrait of an unthinking labourer dependant on the ingenuity of his white master.

Even Finance Minister Tendai Biti seems to be clearly caught up in the racially-created illusion that says white owned ACR will add value to the perception of Zimbabwe’s diamonds than black owned Mbada and Canadile.

When Africa gets to that point of an appropriate understanding of its own history and culture, we then can be assured of an honest and accurate appraisal of our own strengths and needs, as well as those of our counterparts from other races, especially those of Europeans.

It is only this kind of understanding that will provide Africa with the strategic and tactical means to liberate itself from white supremacy.

Managing African Resources

The vulnerability of the economic organisation of the African community to the stresses placed on it by the dominant white supremacist establishment is principally caused by the repression of African centred consciousness and identity.

We have a situation where African economic institutions and resources are primarily owned, controlled, and exploited by aliens. We are even made to believe that this cruel reality is part of world freedoms and a civilised realisation of property rights. This is purely why Zimbabwe’s reclamation of its colonially stolen farmlands is regarded by Westerners as a violation of property rights.

Post independent Africa is still to achieve the ability to finance and construct the necessary social institutions to educate, train and generally socialise its constituents and provide them with the personal and social competencies which together could successfully mediate, resist, and finally overcome the hegemonic intentions of white supremacy.

It is important for Africans to foster a spirit of African nationalism and in that regard control their internal markets and resources. We need to utilise the resulting proceeds to remediate and finance our entry into international markets.

For this to happen, it is important for Africa to simultaneously pursue control of markets with the rapid and effective African centred education and socialisation of all its constituents, young and old. The scepticism from some Zimbabweans over the viability of the recently proposed indigenisation policies is basically a result of a lack of confidence in African ability, and that in itself is a result of a lack of education and socialisation in self-belief.

We need to move as a people towards relative economic independence, towards power and prestige; towards African centred cultural organisation and identity, high levels of personal and social competence. This is the only way we can engage on the forward march towards total liberation.

Neutralising Western induced pressures

The coping mechanism of African people is stressed by the effects of institutionalised racism and an international relations system driven by inherent injustices. The situation is not made any better by the amplification of an orientation towards dependency and the donor syndrome.

Africa is home to the multi-billion donor run charity industry and that is not in any way a measure of blessing. It is in fact Africa’s greatest curse after slavery and colonialism. Dependency is as crippling and ruinous as any known form of subjugation and oppression.

When a continent emerging from hundreds of years of colonial oppression has a virtual absence of a robust and independent movement that seeks to move away from subjugation, what you end up with is such vulnerability as we have seen through the exploitation we have seen Africa suffer at the hands of predatory aliens hailing from Europe.

The injurious effects of the oppression we have suffered at the hands of whites can only be attenuated if Africa unites in creating an effective economic-cultural bloc that will advance the interests of black people across the world in a way that will see them treated as equals with all other people of this world. We must come to a point where we view oppression-related problems as challenges to be positively solved, and as a heroic opportunity rather than an overpowering and onerous burden.

Africa can today overthrow the weight of white supremacy if we choose to engage in a thorough, honest and revolutionary self-critical analysis of the cognitive, emotional, social, informational, linguistic, economical, physical and environmental barriers which help to maintain the political-economic subordination of our people.

It is within the power of the African community to assert our will to total power and independence.

Reversing Reactionary Forces

We have a worrying problem with the African body politic. Our political leadership is littered with reactionary characters operating entirely on Eurocentric values and dictates, and even openly proud of it all.

We need the African body politic to immerse itself in the centre of an African centred political and cultural force field. This is the only way we can repel the sustained hold on our political leadership by white supremacy.

It is time we ensure that we invest in the African body politic the natural African-centred knowledge, consciousness and identity. We have to immediately free the African body politic from its Eurocentric prison, and our political leadership must be denuded of its Western markings, sensibilities, tastes and appetites. We have a duty to restore our mental and physical mechanisms so that we can train ourselves to do and to produce for self.

The energy of the African political being must be redirected from its exhaustive expenditure in the construction and maintenance of reactionary psychological defences and damage control devices to the construction and maintenance of an African centred problem-solving consciousness and identity driven by an indomitable sense of mission.

The enormous energy hosted by the African body politic must be directed toward growth and the creation of opportunities for Africa’s positive expression. This idea of Africans being manipulated by Eurocentric donors in a way that results in our people pursuing the values and interests of aliens must just be discredited and abandoned.

It does not make any sense for a Zimbabwean to be at the forefront of blocking the trading of the country’s diamonds just because they are paid by white supremacists to spend their energy doing so. Neither does it make any sense that the Zimbabwean journalists at The Standard newspaper and its sister papers, the Zimbabwe Independent and NewsDay are paid for fronting the voice of white supremacists of Rhodesian background.

Coping Strategies and Tactics

The consumerist culture of the African today is driven by eurocentrically-induced lacks, deprivations, needs, anxieties and appetites. Our people have an addictive and obsessive pursuit for compulsive consumption of Western vanity and this kills positive African-centred practices, pursuits and pleasures.

We must begin to teach our young people power relations. Our liberation can only come from a deep study and teaching of power-knowledge relations; a teaching of imaginative, creative, strategic and tactical organisation as the keys to power and self-defence.

It takes action to change the status quo of the African. The kind of action that is needed is based on an ability to discern the real issues and causes of the trials and tribulations from within and from outside the African body politic.

Our economists, politicians, business people and the generality of our people must develop an ability to solve African problems based on sound knowledge; on objective appraisals of its situation, and on its intuitive and well-developed ability to undertake conscious, rational, and constructive course of action.

Control of labelling and treatment processes

The interests of oppressors lie in changing the consciousness of the oppressed, not the situation which oppresses them. The more the oppressed can be led to adapt to the ways of the oppressor; the more easily they can be dominated. Oppressors produce a consciousness in the oppressed not only by manipulating their ecological and sociological lifestyles and possibilities but also by naming the world in which both they and the oppressed exist. To name, to label, is to bring into consciousness and therefore to transform consciousness. This is why the Westerner will use every meddling tactic imaginable to dictate the lifestyles of people in other countries.

This the only way the oppressor can control the lives of these people. The Westerner wants to name and label for the African what human rights are, what democracy is, what property rights are, and what rule of law is.

This is done so that he can position himself as the controller of the lives of those for whom he labels things.

The only way Africa can transform the oppressive situation under which we live, and overcome white domination; is to deny and revoke the oppressor’s right to the licence to name the world, to categorise, to classify, or otherwise demarcate the world and people’s behaviour.

Africans must assert their right and power of self-definition — of categorising and classifying the world and the nature of their being in it.

We must come to a point where we can prescribe treatments for our own behaviour and establish the conditions of our lives. African power is defined by liberation, and liberation itself is defined by independent thought and total control of resources and the means of production.

There must be no apologies for independent nationalism and economic empowerment policies. Zimbabwe owes no apology to any single displaced white settler farmer that lost colonially acquired farmland during the Third Chimurenga.

Liberation is no cause for guilt or apologies.

African interests must be centred on African needs and aspirations and there is no reason to feel bad when Africa reclaims what belongs to it.

Whites did not feel bad when they plundered our wealth and enslaved us and the only morality that must guide African policy is the morality of reclamation and equality.

That is what understanding and utilising power is all about and the guide must be the self-interest of Africa.

There is no time to empathise with the misfortunes of beneficiaries of oppression and colonial imbalances, especially if such misfortune is in the context of the correction of these injustices.

Our interests as Africans must define our relations with the Westerner and only this attitude will sustain our resolve to regain full control of our continent and its resources.

Africa we are one and together we will overcome. It is homeland or death!

Reason Wafawarova is a political writer based in Sydney, Australia and can be contacted on Wafawarova@yahoo.co.uk or reason@rwafawarova.com or visit www.rwafawarova @com

Brown

Castor's picture

It is Africa

reason 's picture

It is Africa and not anyone else who should lead this process Brown was talking about.

Diversity of opinions

You present a well structured and organised case for the resolution of the African predicament. Your defence of Africa's right to self determination is laudable. You make an accurate observation that the expenditure of energy, time and resources on reactionary psychological defences and damage control devices is exhaustive. Your conclusion then, that we require a leadership that hunts after ability for Africa to engage in proactive, self-interested productive activity is commendable. My concern is however, that in your condemnation of The Standard newspaper and all its sister newspapers, you risk isolating your viewpoints or any other critical viewpoint from the necessary criticism they require. Diversity of opinion, as you must know, should be encouraged, especially of African opinion. It is this African opinion that we require to solve our problems and not to fight the west.

Thank you

reason 's picture

Thank you so much Black Light. My position on the editorial policy of the Standard and its sister papers is based on what I read and on the interaction I had with staffers there recently.

I just thought the reporters are not allowed to freely express their findings but to do the bidding of some powerful forces behind the finances that run their media house.

I agree we need diversity of opinion and mine is quite diverse from that of expressed by the Standard or by the West.

Unlike Zimpapers or the ZBC

Unlike Zimpapers or the ZBC where there is no Zanu-PF/Mugabe interference and reporters are free to report without bias and pigs might fly and fairies do live in the bottom of the garden.

Ask Joram Nyathi

reason 's picture

Ask Joram Nhathi who left the Independent and The Standard and he will tell you how he was manipulated to report what Rhodesians wanted. He protested and left.

Are you now saying that

Are you now saying that Zimpapers and the ZBC provide an unbiased view of political life in Zimbabwe? Take the recent examples of Zanu-PF/Mugabe jingles on ZBC do they present a balanced view in your mind Reason?

Songs

reason 's picture

Those songs are just songs from an album by an artist and they are neither jingles nor are they supposed to provide any political balance. Who said artists must perform political balancing acts?

I am saying Joram Nyathi left the Independent because he refused to write what the Rhodesians wanted him to write. He is quite vocal about it all.

INSPIRING!

thanx for the inspiring article.
quite hopeful and insightful; just whhat we lack in writing and deed.
believe nobody will chart our destiny than ourselves as africans.

THANK YOU SO MUCH

reason 's picture

Thank you so much Tich. I am happy someone is inspired to act for the good of our own continent.

Power Misunderstood

Power is indeed comprised of strategies for influence or control over outcomes, but our host completely fails to comprehend strategies on how the continent outcomes can be produced or differentially enabled.

Rather than explore the multiple conceptions of power our host suggested strategies are not aimed at influencing or proactively controlling outcomes but are defensive dispositions, maneuvers, tactics, and techniques aimed at neutralizing or frustrating competing strategies from the west.

This approach is akin to a soccer coach who hopes to win the world cup on any entirely defensive strategy.......unfortunately soccer is won not by the number of defensive tackles but the number of strategies that lead to goals, which are acknowledged by a subjective referee.

It is as if the neutralizing of western strategies to influence or control would on its own improve our outcomes. My argument is that neutralizing western influence only serve to frustrate the western ambitions on our continent but does little to none to make us powerful.

Whereas yesterday the raw material from the belly of our continent was being exploited for the benefit of the west, the defensive strategies deployed since our liberation has not increased our power but merely neutralized the west not for our benefit but for the benefit of the east. The raw ore at a mine in Zambia or South Africa may not be destined for the shores of the west but of the eastern shores of China. A generation from now we will deploy another defensive strategy this time against the east.

Japan was not built on defensive strategy but on proactive dispositions, maneuvers, tactics, and techniques aimed at building a sustainable society not an effective adversary of the west. China growth is not founded on a defensive strategy against the west but also on influencing and controlling her outcomes even if the strategies meant investing billions of dollars in the US markets.

On the contrary, the USSR collapsed not because her people lacked the confidence or consciousness but because the defensive strategy meant that her development was limited by the extent of western aggression. It’s the same weakness that led to failure of communism over capitalism. Communism is principally founded not on its merits but on the defense, criticism and ambitions to neutralize capitalism…….thus it always lagged behind.

The strategies for our people should be founded on soft power and not hard power. We need to debate and have agreement within our continent “on cultural values, dialogues on economic and political ideology, the attempt to influence through good example, and the appeal to commonly accepted human values” and with these established values use continent wide and regional diplomacy, dissemination of information, analysis, even propaganda, and cultural programming to achieve political ends at a global stage.

Coercive tactics of hard power might have thankfully worked during the cold war era of our liberation but may not be optimal for our less strong continent in the post cold war era. Hard power through coercive sanctions as applied on Zimbabwe or even military force as applied on Saddam’s Iraq can only be sustained by stronger of nations, but always fails in the post cold war era if applied by less strong countries to achieve even noble objectives as we noticed with the land reform in Zimbabwe.

Reversing reactionary western forces and eliminating western styled consumerist culture may be exciting theories in academic halls but in the streets of Mbare and Soweto consciousness and self worth can only be built and sustained when we have values, institutions and strategies that earn the confidence of our people.

This is why some of us are supportive of New Partnership for Africa's Development and the African Peer Review Mechanism. These strategies are inward looking and aims at making ourselves better at our Ubuntu and not founded on neutralizing anyone's strategies.

It is only when we are operating at our best that we will be able to out compete other strategies wherever they come from.........east or west.

The continent

reason 's picture

Nepad is good model on soft power approaches and we will adopt it as a continent, one way or the other. However NEPAD and like structured programs will need hard power first to pave way for negotiating power for Africa.

NEPAD

Deitric Muhammad's picture

I never liked NEPAD, because it is a ploy similar to the African Development Bank that is designed to keep Africa in an indebted position.

Mbeki

reason 's picture

Thabo Mbeki has exciting and interesting inputs into Nepad and I think some of them can be adopted easily.

Who has the controlling hand

Deitric Muhammad's picture

Who has the controlling hand in NEPAD?

I am still studying it

reason 's picture

I am still studying NEPAD; they say MBEKI was the key driver. We have to see what is happening first.

I remember NEPAD was

Deitric Muhammad's picture

I remember NEPAD was introduced to the African continent in 2005 when the African continent was bombarded with unwanted aid and genetically-modified seeds and produce which were known to be sterile. It was a huge package deal.

I remember

reason 's picture

I remember that too. It was a dependency dose.

You argue the case for more

You argue the case for more inward looking proactive policies and I agree with you since an African can play best the game of being African. Yet, the very fact that we are all competing against each other for the same base of resources brings into play the equations and matrices of natural selection. Survival of the fittest, in which defence mechanisms are as important as offensive mechanisms. This is a competitive world and your analogy illustrates that by pointing out that the interplay of international relations is like a soccer match. The question then becomes whether you acknowledge that if it is the west we are playing, then at some point they are bound to want to score goals against us. I am certain you realize that necessitates defence mechanisms. This is especially so given the history of our matches with this opponent, the goals they scored with slavery and imperialism. You also note the fact that there is a subjective referee in this match. I am certain then, that you are aware of the horrible feeling one gets when a legal goal is disallowed, or when a goal is made after an infringement of a player or a foul. The question then becomes, to what extent is this referee subjective in real life? I do not suppose by referee you mean institutions like the World Trade Organisation, the IMF, the World Bank and the litany of UN institutions, for we all know their dismal record where fair play is concerned. I believe you also realizes the flawed nature of the world's refereeing system in that the rule book is written by a very few set of players, needless is it to point out that the very same few players wield the pockets that sustain the livelihoods of the referees. Surely you should know how dangerous it is to play a game when the playing field is not level. Given all that, I would say Africa's assertion for a more balanced playing field is justified, which does not in any way rule out offensive measures.

Referee

reason 's picture

We cannot rely on the monitoring structures established by our rivals in world affairs. That is futile.

The west is indeed a player,

The west is indeed a player, but please note that we are playing not just the west(and in fact with regards to resources, which is our competitive adavantage, the west is an economic player in decline) but the whole world and in particular China and India who are the emerging players and referees of world resource trade relations.

With the end of the cold war politics, new globalised trade and the emerging China and Asian resource players and referees, the rule book is obviously changing. A defence strategy that is based on the trials and tribulations of colonialism has become irrelevant and a distraction. We risk being like the Italian Soccer Team trapped in the glory of yesteryear (in our case the tribulations of colonialism) that they failed to change and be ready for soccer of 2010. Or shall we become like the French Soccer Team, failed by an inability to blend the greats of yesteryear and the prospects of tomorrow?

China seeks no colony in Africa..........but it goes further, it processes no ore in the mines in Zambia or Zimbabwe but exports the resources raw together with the value adding jobs! China does provide funding for construction in Africa..............but only to Chinese owned companies with cheap labour sourced from China and not from the streets of Mbare or Soweto. Yes, China is not interested in corruption and political reforms as publicised by the western donors........much the same strategy employed in Saudi Arabia by the west. The truth is that "China’s development policy is first and foremost about China’s development, not Africa’s."

Our continent requires sustainability and transparency in our economics and politics.

In pursuing this vision, we cannot afford to practise hard power for we neither have the economic or military might to pick and sustain a fight with the powerful. Even China realises that even as powrful as it has become now is not the time to pick a fight with the west.........and hence she even invests in the USA and trades in US Dollars to sustain that economy.

When we choose hard power approach to our politics.........be it in land reform or managing our internal politics..........that is not a defense as articulated by our host..........that is picking a fight with an opponent who is both opponent and referee .........a fight that over the past 10 years has left our confidence drained and taken our social and economic development more years back.

My argument is that our defence lies in our soft power strategy. Lets develop our social, economic and political institutions for sustainable development. Lets use soft power to articulate the land reform.........just like the Chinese did to explain away the pegging of the Yuan to the US Dollar or the South Africans to explain black economic empowerment. Lets leverage on the prevailing guilty from the west to advance the case for economic and social financial support and opening up of markets especially on agriculture production.

We are a sanctioned

reason 's picture

We are a sanctioned country and that means we already face the reality of hard power against us. This is where we are coming from, and I think I agree with your strategies in as far as the building of trade relations is concerned. But in as far as defending our right to resource ownership is concerned our hard power foreign policy is to me very relevant.

The very fact that we are a

The very fact that we are a country under sanctions should signal to us that hard power counter attacks are no option and am sure those of our people at home bear the marks for it.

The solution to sanctions, indeed a hard power reaction by powerful states, cannot be countered by instituting counter unending hard power coercion on the white farm owners, contested elections (2008) with unsustained arrests of political opposition (Roy Bennet and Morgan Tsvangirai) or human rights activists (Jestina Mukoko and the like).

What we need is the practice of soft power.................creating sustainable institutions that can assure our freedom and stability beyond the current generation of leaders. We need our land reforms to be beyond the scrutiny of our adversaries. We need the transparenacy and governance of diamond fields to be beyond the scrutiny of our detractors.

We need to practice our ubuthu and excel at it..............so much that Ubuthu like the vuvuzela becomes a social, political and economic ideology for export.

What happened

reason 's picture

What happened to soft power when we had the willing buyer willing seller policy and the 1997 Land Summit? What happened when Africa demanded the attendance of RG Mugabe at Lisbon 2007 through hard power?

When do you use hard power and when do you use soft power?

Hard power on land reform, if

Hard power on land reform, if at all, could have been used immediately after our independence when we had the opportunity to leverage on the then existing cold war environment as we did with our liberation struggle.

Post cold war, the use of hard power by weaker states is not sustainable because one is left exposed and vulnerable to the counter attacks of stronger nations.........Zimbabwe and Georgia should know better.

We are in an era of soft power...........that is preciely why PLO in Palestine (as opposed to Hamas) have adopted a slightly non confrontational strategy because they realise that with the end of Cold War.........use of hard power could no longer be effectively sustained.

The times have changed my brother. We better changed with the times or we will be dragged along kicking and all!

We have the land

reason 's picture

We have the land firm in our hands and when we thought the GPA would threaten the gains we simply embarked on another hard power campaign and that way the efforts to reverse were diverted and that is soft power to me. Freath and others simply suffered from a strategy to distract those who thought they could push for changes to the reforms and it worked wonders.

We won the hard power on land and that battle is done and all left is to begin producing and produce we will.

I am sure the battle is won

I am sure the battle is won but that is not the question..............the question is rather at what cost and could we have implemented the reform any better with minimum cost on the social well being of our people, especially those silient majority who were not the direct beneficiaries of the reform.

Not every end justifies the means...........at times we can celebrate the end whilst questioning the means and learning if not for us then perhaps for posterity.

We can

reason 's picture

We can interrogate the means but we cherish this victory.

A Victory based on theft......Schweet!!!

Gideon Gono resisting IMF audit of RBZ

The country's controversial central bank governor, Gideon Gono, is reported to be resisting an International Monetary Fund (IMF) audit of the bank's finances, following revelations it was looted by senior ZANU PF officials.

The Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (RBZ) is saddled with financial liabilities of more than US$1 billion, incurred during a period of looting and quasi-fiscal activities that propped up the Mugabe regime. The bank was given US$10 million this year to cover its operational costs but complained that the money was inadequate.

Finance Minister Tendai Biti is adamant that a forensic audit of the bank will be a pre-condition for any additional funding. Questions remain over how the US$1 billion in liabilities was incurred. Press reports abound that officials in several syndicates were able to transfer looted money into offshore accounts. The scandal involving ZANU PF activist and businessman Temba Mliswa also proved an eye opener. Mliswa somehow swindled the bank of US$12 million and attempts to recover the money were half-hearted. Only a recent spat with police chief Augustine Chihuri resulted in this and other buried crimes being brought to the public notice.

The IMF was in Zimbabwe last month and released a report exposing how the RBZ was deviating from its core business of financial sector and prices stability. "Without appropriate oversight, the RBZ used the international reserves backing the statutory reserves of banks (US$80 million) and sold shares from its portfolio of securities at the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange (US$38 million) to finance its activities during January 2009 - March 2010,'the IMF said in the report.

While many analysts had welcomed the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe Act, saying it would trim the excessive powers of Gono, the latest developments point to a 'business as usual' culture still prevalent at the institution. Not only is Gono blocking the IMF audit, but external auditors are said to have reported 'serious weaknesses in internal controls and financial reporting, and comprehensive monetary statistics have not been published since early 2008.'

Where is Gono

reason 's picture

Where is Gono's comment on this? Sloppy journalism.

That's ripe coming from you

That's ripe coming from you Reason a contributor to a newspaper called the Zanu-PF/Mugabe mouthpiece that never seeks comment from MDC-T or Tsvangarai it simply prints malicious and incorrect stories.

Chamisa

reason 's picture

Chamisa is always quoted in every Herald story on the MDC-T.

What utter shit!!! The Herald is a hack paper.

You seem to know little about the role of the press or media in anything outside of a facist state.

Your own writings would not be published outside of the Herald and you know it. Not for any other reason thanb that it is of such a poor standard and is full of racist, secxist and reactionary ramblings which contradict so badly as to make you a zanoid psychopath.

You - and a few nutters on this forum - are the only ones that can't see that.

My writings

reason 's picture

My writings are published elsewhere other than The Herald and you know it.

They are not - the are free reprints not published

There is not another paper that would touch your bilge - maybe in Morth Korea - but you are not published elsewhere. Prove it.

Google it

reason 's picture

Google it.

I have and they are just blogs and reprints. Sorry

You spent a long time losing this subject already on this forum. You posted a list and none of the pieces was more than a repring form the Herald - and you could not show other publications that published your work so don't pull that one again.

You know very well you are spinning a web of lies on this subject - and your ignorance of the media means you have little idea of just why nobody will touch your stuff.

Papers

reason 's picture

Papers in Kenya, Zambia, Namibia, South America have all sought permission to reprint some of my article and one in the Middle East does so with each piece.

Your BBC has had me on interviews four times and they featured me on a Focus on Africa magazine once.

So you have NOT published outside of the Herald

Why do you have to be so damn evasive and so eager to LIE.

You admit that these were reprints and the BBC was years ago and you were commissioned as a pro-Zanu person in a comparison article of opposing sides. This can not be taken as commissioned work that journalists writers so every day.

Your are utterly delusional.

You are a hack for the Herald and people use you as such - to illustrate the appaling standards of logic and the defense of the immoral that you fill your columns with.

So a request for proff that you are commissioned by other papers to write is NON SENSE again. Last time you tried this you failed as well with a list of bogus publications and blog sites. You were shown to be a LIAR then and now you try to pull the same stunt.

This is not acceptable. You have Zero credibility.

Your idea

reason 's picture

Your idea of publishing is quite weird.

No - I know what I am talkning about. You are a HACK

Your writing appears in the Herald - and you refuse to disclose whether they pay for this by the kilometer or it is a freeebie paid from someones else's budget. After this the pieces are cited or reproduced on other peoples blogs and some web aggregators free of charge. This does not make them published - they are just reproduced there.

SO - BY YOUR OWN EVIDENCE - the Herald is the only media (sic!) to publish your drivel - no respectable pubication out side of North Korea would touch it.

How many time do you have to lie about this without any evidence???????

Do not mention the BBC thing again as that has been shown up for what it was - on other occasions.

I have

reason 's picture

I have been on various radio stations, on Press TV, I run my own radio show actually, and my writings are published by The Herald mainly, with a lot other media outlets publishing some of my work on conditions that are private information.

I understand totally why you are so angry with my work, and I appreciate where you are coming from. I can only promise more anger and frustration on your part, much as I hate to announce that.

You said "My writings are

You said "My writings are published elsewhere other than The Herald and you know it". - and then you can't provide any evidence and say I have a weird idea of publication!!!. What a fool. How come these other media outlets are not found on google and the list you supplied that last time was bogus. You are the fool on this subject.

I am not angry with your worthless work - I just like to make you make a fool of yourself through your constant lies, exagerations and distortions - that no serious journal, newspaper or publication would see fit to print.

The pen is mightier than than the sword - but you write with a blunt Zanoo crayon - That is very laughable.

You have issues

reason 's picture

You really have issues don't you? What is the point of all this.

Why do you make such a rank

Why do you make such a rank fool of yourself?! It's best you hide behind anonymity. Reason has provided evidence of his publications on many fora worldwide. A foolish coward must hide behind the cloak of anonymity in order to not reveal the physical countenance of the carrier of such an idiotic and foolish mind. Damn you're dumb!

I am happy

reason 's picture

I am happy someone else has had to say this. Thank you for telling it like it is. Maybe he will listen this time around.

Why do you make such a rank

Why do you make such a rank fool of yourself?! It's best you hide behind anonymity

You do exactly the same, you are a hypocrite

He talks

reason 's picture

He talks sense and you hardly do. That is the difference.

The links he provides are bogus....That's the point

So Mr anonymous - Reason has given a list of his publications and they all turned out to be blog references to the Herald writings - There was not ONE piece besides the BBC magazine article where he was asked as a ZanuPF supporter to write something alongside a much better piece from a writer opposed to Mugabe. That is not a commissioned piece of writing.

It is abvious that the Herald does not pay for his rants - and nobody else does. So he is not the independent analyst he claims to be. He is a propogandist in the model of Goebells - one of his favourite writers whose words about Nazi Germany - Reason found very ideologically powerful and he praised that writer. That surely gives you an insight into the way his brain works and a powerful indictment of his lunacy as a racist propogandist.

He has not written widely - he has been lifted by aggragators on the web. That is it. Reason and obviously You - also anonymous are the ones that are DUMB. You think you can pull the wool over our eyes - but convince no-one and end up looking stupid as you do now. Why defend him anonymously and provide nothing but his bullshit as evidence. DUMB.

You would

reason 's picture

You would praise me a lot if I took white supremacy for civilisation would you not? I am not like that. I will write against white supremacy until it disappears. That is my credo and you got to live with it.

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 27 guests online.

Who's new

  • Storgoggimmet
  • Alyna
  • Galia
  • Theplyplaycle
  • zolioveaviels